If you like other people to cite your paper, a few they read it first. Why don’t we assume that the name while the abstract of the paper have actually convinced your peers which they should visit your paper. It’s then your work associated with the Introduction part to make certain in and to show them around as it were, guiding them to the other parts of the paper (Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion) that they start reading it and keep reading it, to pull them.
You are told by this article, with examples, what you need to use in the Introduction and what you need to abandon, and exactly exactly what reviewers and journal editors look out for in this area.
What’s the purpose of the Introduction part?
Quite simply, the Introduction should answer fully the question ‘Why:’ why you select that subject for research; why it is necessary; why you adopted a method that is particular approach; and so forth. You may also think about the Introduction because the area that points out of the space in knowledge that all of those other paper will fill, or the area by which you define and claim your territory in the broad part of research.
One other task the Introduction must do is always to provide some back ground information and set the context. This can be done by explaining the investigation issue you considered or the research question you asked (within the body that is main of paper, you are going to provide the means to fix the situation or even the response to issue) and also by shortly reviewing just about any solutions or approaches which have been tried into the past.